![]() ![]() CNBC's Eamon Javers contributed to this report. ![]() Joseph Evangelisti, a spokesman for JPMorgan, in an email to CNBC said, "Plaintiffs like the headlines, but no amount of time on the record will change the fact that Jamie never met the man, never worked with the man, and wishes in hindsight the man had never been a client of the firm." "This pattern of producing documents from the custodial files of witnesses after their depositions has persisted throughout the discovery period." "For example, the weekend prior to the close of fact discovery, and immediately after the May 26 deposition of its CEO Jamie Dimon, JPMC produced 1,500 documents, some of which came from the custodial files of witnesses whose depositions had long passed," McCawley wrote. "Despite the Court's clear warning, JPMC still failed to expeditiously produce documents from the custodial files of key witnesses, some of whom had already been deposed, for strategic reasons," the lawyer wrote. McCawley noted that Rakoff in May had admonished JPMorgan for turning over documents to the plaintiff's legal team "at an inexplicably slow rate." Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan will testify Sunday at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption trial to answer questions about an alleged supply line of champagne and cigars funneled to the Israeli leader and his wife said to have been in exchange for help with Milchan’s personal and business needs. Dimon, with this document during his deposition had it been produced in a timely manner," the filing said. "Plaintiff would have confronted JPMC's CEO, Mr. ![]() and yet waited to do so until 2019 despite the myriad red flags and public reports about Epstein's conduct over the years," the filing said. "These documents demonstrate that JPMC was fully capable of learning the full extent of Epstein and Staley's personal relationship. One late-produced document was a timeline that among other things referenced emails in which a then-top bank executive Jes Staley asks Epstein a question. One such document, turned over after Dimon's deposition was taken May 26, "appears to refer to a 2019 internal review of electronic communications with Jeffrey Epstein, conducted after Epstein's 2019 arrest and death," according to the filing. ![]() In addition to Dimon, the accuser's lawyers want to reopen the depositions of Mary Erdoes, who is CEO of JPMorgan's asset and wealth management division Mary Casey, who was Epstein's banker for about a decade at JPMorgan and a fourth person, only identified in the filing as JPMorgan's "representative."Īll four would be asked about documents turned over only after their initial depositions, the filing said. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower There is no intent to change any result in any ruling on evidence admissibility.Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit These changes are intended to be stylistic only. The language of Rule 602 has been amended as part of the restyling of the Evidence Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules-1988 Amendment Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules-1987 Amendment The reference to Rule 703 is designed to avoid any question of conflict between the present rule and the provisions of that rule allowing an expert to express opinions based on facts of which he does not have personal knowledge. This rule would, however, prevent him from testifying to the subject matter of the hearsay statement, as he has no personal knowledge of it. This rule does not govern the situation of a witness who testifies to a hearsay statement as such, if he has personal knowledge of the making of the statement. It will be observed that the rule is in fact a specialized application of the provisions of Rule 104(b) on conditional relevancy. These foundation requirements may, of course, be furnished by the testimony of the witness himself hence personal knowledge is not an absolute but may consist of what the witness thinks he knows from personal perception. “* * * he rule requiring that a witness who testifies to a fact which can be perceived by the senses must have had an opportunity to observe, and must have actually observed the fact” is a “most pervasive manifestation” of the common law insistence upon “the most reliable sources of information.” McCormick §10, p. Notes of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules This rule does not apply to a witness’s expert testimony under Rule 703. Evidence to prove personal knowledge may consist of the witness’s own testimony. A witness may testify to a matter only if evidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |